|
Back to Future 2 Posters
Photos Art
Search for Posters Art Prints, photos and get
results from all the many categories from Amazon including
books, videos, dvds, toys, video games, and more.
|
|
|
Posters Art
Prints Photos collectables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
If for some reason you can't find what the
poster or art print your looking for try using the search boxes
below
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
List Price: $19.98Price: $14.09 You Save: $5.89 (29%)Prices subject to change.
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Buy Now!
Audience Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Binding: VHS Tape
EAN: 9786301666565
Format: Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, NTSC
ISBN: 6301666569
Label: Universal Studios
Manufacturer: Universal Studios
Number Of Items: 1
Publisher: Universal Studios
Release Date: March 01, 1992
Sales Rank: 1501
Studio: Universal Studios
Theatrical Release Date: November 22, 1989
Related Items:
Browse for similar items by category:
Editorial Review:
Amazon.com essential video:
Critics and audiences didn't seem too happy with this inventive, perhaps too clever sequel to the popular 1985 comedy about a high school kid (Michael J. Fox) who travels into the past and has to bring his parents together (or lose his own existence). Director Robert Zemeckis and cast bent over backwards to add layers of time-travel complication to this follow-up, and while it surely exercises the brain it isn't necessarily funny in the same way that its predecessor was. It's well worth a visit, though, just to appreciate the imagination that went into it, particularly in a finale that has Fox's character watching his own actions from the first film. --Tom Keogh
Average Rating: 
Rating:  -
IN A NUTSHELL: DOES WHAT A TIME TRAVEL MOVIE IS SUPPOSED TO DO!
This sequel of the superb "Back To The Future" is a very earnest attempt to follow a winning formula up with a truly worthwhile effort in this sequel. Complex, yes, but interesting. Unfortunately, at times it gets a bit too mechanically contrived with the time sequence derivations, and I find myself mentally checking the continuity which detracts from the theme. Nevertheless, if you liked the first "Back To The Future" you ... Read More
Rating:  -
Jason & The Scorchers fans might like this
one as Jason himself has an unbilled cameo
in it as Future Biff's head thug! The Rock
N Roll connection shouldn't faze fans of the
genre since Michael A. Fox (cousin of Andy,
who played on Thunder And Fire)[Michael's
real name, above, too] and Fox, who was a
big fan of Cheap Trick's "always on MTV"
stuff of that period, had a Van Halen solo
in the cassette in the "Darth Vader from
Planet ... Read More
Rating: -
"There are now two of me here and there are two of you here. The other me, is the Doc Brown from 1955. The one who helps the other you get back to 1985. Remember the event at the clock tower?"
"Yeah!"
"That event doesn't happen until tonight. So you must be careful no to run into your otherself."
- Doc Brown, of 1985, gives Marty McFly a severe headache in the ways of physical time travel in "Back To The Future Part II"
The time travel adventures (or ... Read More
Rating: -
I just wanted to say that I grew up watching the Back to the Future trilogy and will be the first to say that these movies are absolutely brilliant. If you don't own these movies, own them. They should grace every homes movie collection. They are good on so many levels. The great thing is, the older I get, and the more I watch them, the more I catch that is interesting or funny...it just keeps getting better.
These movies are so quotable, my whole family is always dropping lines from these ... Read More
Rating: -
Well, there are five reasons. The first four are found in the review of the DVD set of all five; here is the last one:
5. Gestalt. Call it what you want, but consider the conceptual continuity of these three movies. 1985 remained the "present" for all the films, right? Even this one and BTTF3, made some years later, preserved 1985 as the fulcrum year.
Quick quiz: of all the eras depicted, which one was the best: 1885, 1955, 1985 or 2015? Tough question, given that there ... Read More
|
